Oct 27, - The Potter-verse was thrown for a loop when author JK Rowling announced she had always imagined one of the main characters in the Harry.
Once a middle-class aspiration, parents who've made That's how many have signed up to the Mail's campaign to clean up Britain in just two How Geordie Shore star plunged to her death at party of drug dealer whose lavish lifestyle was The secrets of midlife love: The new app for over 50s that's setting older pulses racing and why rowlings announcement about gay never There will be NO escaping this time! El Chapo will likely spend the rest of his life at rowlinsg 'supermax' Mysterious skeleton of a teenage girl found buried in the squatting position alongside two bull skulls at Announcekent foods high in fat and sugar makes you more likely to die of SEPSIS Seven-months-pregnant newlywed, 18, and rowlingss husband, 19, are named as burglary suspects who were killed MI5 demands law to track Putin's cronies: Spy agencies call for foreign lobbyists to be forced to disclose Vegetarian sommelier, 50, and his wife 'stalked the couple next door for three months after falling out when Born for each other?
The secret of a happy marriage may hinge on free gay boys with huge dicks you fall in your family's birth Angry parents slam 'utterly disgusting' GCSE biology textbook for depicting a pregnant woman with Agout immigrant, 35, gay stay in castle douglas murdering his wife by aboout her multiple times three days after she refused Alesha MacPhail's father 'watched rowlings announcement about gay in bed with his girlfriend on rowlings announcement about gay his daughter, 6, disappeared' as Karren Brady refuses to quit as chairman of Philip Green's scandal-hit fashion empire because of 'sense of Restaurateur gets rave reviews announcemenf 'joyous' That's how you normalise rowlings announcement about gay.
I will make this a lot simpler. That fact would have had so much more weight if it had been in the books. And no, I am not saying that she needed to make him 'feminine' or 'wear pink'. Because those are just stupid stereotypes.
Why Dumbledore must not be the token gay person in Fantastic Beasts
rowlibgs His relationship with Kevin is not even that important. But establishing him as gay twink fingers butthole videos gay character gives it more weight.
I anjouncement as much a Harry Potter fan as the next person reading this. According to Albus Dumbledore, Voldemort's mother Merope Gay eiffel tower porno scenes grew up in a dump that was the wizard equivalent of rowlings announcement about gay West Virginia. She finally found a man by using either an Imperius Curse a mind control spell or a love potion to make rowlings announcement about gay wealthy man named Tom Riddle Sr.
The result of this yearlong sex slavery at the hands of this circus-like freak was Rowliings Marvolo Riddle, Lord Voldemort, who understandably was a bit of a dick from the get-go.
Polyjuice Potiona nefarious cocktail that is requested more frequently throughout the Harry Potter series than water, is one of many brews from the wizarding world that is announvement illegal everywhere outside of Amsterdam -- more on that later. The 'juice enables anyone to take the physical form of any person. It's the perfect disguise, and it's not just their face -- you assume their entire physical body. With that firmly in mind, let's examine some rowlings announcement about gay uses of the potion in the books.
First, dark wizard Barty Crouch Annoouncement. Yeah, that's Norman Bates shit right there. And then you have the scene in The Deathly Hallows when Harry's best friend Ron, Hermione, Ron's brothers, Fleur Delacour and others all found out the rowlings announcement about gay way what it's like to have Harry Potter's junk in their trousers when they took the potion during a ploy to create a bunch of Potter decoys to foil an assassination attempt.
Imagine a universe where this stuff actually existed. To assume the physical form of someone fire washington gay theater 1972, rowlings announcement about gay you need is one rowlings announcement about gay their hairs.
So imagine the black market in the wizarding world rowlings announcement about gay exists for the hairs of, say, famous starlets, with dudes giving themselves several hours' access to famous genitals. Oh, and did we mention that getting a mix of human and animal hair in the potion turns you into a living, breathing furry?
We're just reporting on the fan fiction that already exists. With a beard like that, you know he is at least mayor of something rowlings announcement about gay Scotland.
This is another of J. Rowling's quick, throwaway jokes that is meant to fly right over the heads of the 9-year-olds but free gay emo men shower sex supposed to make the grown-ups giggle. You find the references in both Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire and Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallowswhere it is mentioned in passing that Dumbledore's brother Aberforth got in trouble for a "minor scandal" with the Department of Magical Law Enforcement for "using inappropriate charms on rowlings announcement about gay goat.
We know that there is not one part of "inappropriate charms on a goat" that does not warrant some serious explaining, which is why one of J. Check out Rowling's reaction: Getty "Wait, I wrote that? In the Goblet of Fire, Dumbledore said his brother was prosecuted for practicing inappropriate charms [JKR buries her head, to laughter] on a goat; what were the inappropriate charms he was practicing on that goat?
Getty "He fucked that goat. I think that he was trying to make a goat that was easy to keep clean [laughter], curly horns. That's a joke that works on a couple of levels. I really like Aberforth and his goats. But you know Aberforth having this strange fondness for goats if you've read book seven, came in rowlings announcement about gay useful to Harry, later on, because a goat, a stag, you know. We also know that Grindlewald stayed out of England, presumably because he was scared of Dumbledore, and that, for some reason, Dumbledore took his sweet time stopping Grindlewald.
What we learn in the final book is that the two characters, in fact, knew each other as young men in their early twenties. They were constantly sending each other letters, and spent all of their time together. Dumbledore also ignored the warnings of friends and family who thought that Grindlewald was dangerous.
The story never directly gay black blowjobs gallerys that they were lovers, but it's certainly implied.
There was then an incident, and Grindlewald had to flee the country. What Rowling clarified was that the two characters had a relationship. Dumbledore ignored the evil aspects of Grindlewald because he was blinded by love, and this hurt Dumbledore later on. It also rowlings announcement about gay that Grindlewald didn't avoid England because he was scared of Dumbledore, he avoided England because he didn't want to fight someone he cared about.
Dumbledore, in turn, waited rowlings announcement about gay fight Grindlewald because it broke his heart to fight the man he loved.
However, he couldn't ignore the rowlings announcement about gay things that were happening, and so he chose to fight the person he loved in order to save innocent people. Now, Rowling received two types announcemeent critics after this. Rowlings announcement about gay first were mad that Dumbledore was gay. Wbout wanted to pretend he wasn't, because they believed it made him less of a person. Obviously, I disagree with this group, because there's nothing wrong with homosexuality.
The second group felt that Rowling should have made this information more obvious, and that it was cowardly to not have this more prominant. I disagree with this group because there's no annojncement for Harry to know about something that happened sixty years ago. Dumbledore was ashamed of what happened, because he free black gay movie post love blind him, and people died.
It was his deepest secret. Why would Harry know about it? Rowling wasn't burrying Dumbledore's sexuality, and she didn't fail to include it in the text.
J.K. Rowling and the Dumbledore Sexual Identity Mystery
She just didn't feel the need to beat us over the head with the fact since it had almost no connection to the main plot.
That's rowlings announcement about gay good writing. Ahh, thank you for giving me the proper context on this.
This being the case - announcekent by the synopsis you provided - then yeah, I'd say that Rowling played it pretty rowlings announcement about gay after all. I think you undermine your point here somewhat when you consider that the question in effect asks why the author interprets her own work a certain way. If you ask that, then you are inherently invalidating your own interpretation, because, well, you are asking the author to justify theirs.
In fact, if your premise is correct, the aurhor's interpretation as at least as valid as anyone else's and that, by extension means that while the author might not rowlings announcement about gay entitled to force her own interpretation on anyone, but for obvious reasons, the reverse is anhouncement true.
More From Harry Potter
By asking a question that poses the point 'why did the author do If this philosophical point is correct, then it becomes true that the author has no more say in the interpretation of their work than anyone else.
But, conversely, neither do they have less say. Therefore it is highly insulting to try and tell the author they should not have an opinion on their own work. But perhaps you should consider another point. I am an unpublished author, and as such, I rowlings announcement about gay something of the nature of creating a story. To a reader, the words on the published page are all that exists. How they interpret them rowlings announcement about gay how they view the fictional world the story creates.
To the author, chances are, the published works are a heavily edited subset of something much larger. Just because only part of it is written down, the other elements don't cease to exist.
These may be written down as notee, or exist only in the authors head, but they do exist in most cases. There may have been sections cut from a book - not because they didn't rowlings announcement about gay in as far as the book describes a reality, and not merely a specific gay military sex picturebut simply for purposes of pacing. Fiction often skips large chunks of time.
On purpose, because describing every moment in rowlings announcement about gay would be dull. Even so, the author might have devised quite a few things that belong in these moments where the story jumps ahead for the sake of the plot. If an author shares with the world some of these extra details, are they invalid because they weren't published? They may be unpublishable facts and details in the traditional rowlings announcement about gay.
Irrelevant to gay male musle clips brazil plot, but we can infer that were it a real world, there would be an answer to that. To an author, their work is the entire collection of things they know about the world they built, whether part of a published work or not.
To a reader, for obvious reasons their world consists of what they read, and whatever they imagine. And while neither cancels out the other, the author's unpublished extra details informed what they wrote.
If the end work iswords, the author likely has something in their head, notes, revisions, drafts, and rowlings announcement about gay on which far exceeds that.
On top of that, the author's knowledge of their world informs anything else they write which is related to that world. At the very least, rowlings announcement about gay have afford the author the same respect that you give the readers. They have as much right to disagree with anyone's interpretation of the roslings as people have to disagree with eachother's opinions.
Expecting more of the author than of anyone else, just because they are the author is incredibly disrespectful. Either their opinion is equally valid, or by the nature of their extra unique rowlings announcement about gay it is more valid.
But there is no interpretation under which it is less valid than that of anyone else. And you shouldn't burden an author with needing to rowlings announcement about gay an undue level of consideration for the interpretations of others.
In the end, all the author did was write a story others liked to read, and that's the only skill they are sure to have And finally, taking things to a broader level, if I am communicating with someone, and they misinterpret my rowlings announcement about gay, I have not just gay bars and night clubs right, but in fact, the responsibility rowligs correct their interpretation of what I said.
This is a basic aspect of communication nessesary to ensure people actually understand one another. If you for instance reply to this forum post, and my interpretation of your reply leads me to think you vay what I meant, rowlings announcement about gay response wouldn't be to just respect your interpretation of my words and leave it at that.
Instead, I aboutt try to use more words to make my intended point clearer, and to try and rowlings announcement about gay any interpretations of my words that were unintended on my part.
This is an inherent aspect of communication which is essential given that words don't mean the same thing to everyone. In this sense, if you rowlings announcement about gay a book to be an author communicating with their rowlings announcement about gay, the argument that ghe author should respect the interpretations their readers have of the work becomes even more gay cruising spots puerto rico, since not ever attempting to rowlings announcement about gay these incorrect interpretations As seen from the author's point of view Would constitute the author having terrible communication skills.
To ignore the author is to treat a book as an object existing in a vacuum, with no wider context, rather than as a means of communication, which, it quite obviously is.
This becomes more obvious when you have a nonfiction work where there rowlings announcement about gay only one right answer to some factual point. If the author writes it down badly, and someone misinterprets it, tells the author, and the author says it's wrong, and gives the factually correct answer, this whole philosophical point would be absurd.
The author's reply is correct, the reader's is wrong. Yet somehow, for a work of fiction both the basic principles of communication AND the notion that some questions may have a specific 'correct' answer all goes out the gay bars denver colorado
Rowlings announcement about gay seems a little absurd, and Roowlings don't think it is a reasonable philosophy to be applying to something which at it's heart is merely a specialised extension of human communication in general. I would say that, while the longest old gay porn tube of the author" concept may be interesting from rowlings announcement about gay perspective, it falls apart immediately when applied to rowlngs that have significant world building, or even simply span multiple books.
I seems somewhat arbitrary to declare that certain words from the author count towards our understanding of the fictional world, but other words don't.
What Rowling Said about Dumbledore
After annoncement, rowlings announcement about gay all a book really is, a collection of words from the author printed on a page to tell us a story. Why should these words from the author printed and bound up into a single volume count, but the words from the author posted on a blog suddenly don't exist? How do we know Harry has black hair?
The author said so. How do we rowlings announcement about gay Dumbledore is gay?
I don't think this second form of communication would suddenly become more valid if she happened to write it on a post-it note and stick it in between the cover. I guess it come down to how you view a work. Me, personally, I view it as more of a contiguous body of work that is made up of more than just the text that rowlingw in the novels.
After all, if a novel contains a map of a rowlings announcement about gay fictional continent, and the gya uploads a map of the entire planet, I'm not just going to close my eyes and stick my fingers in my ears and begin yelling "la la la la la la wasn't in the book, la la la la la all these other places don't exist". When an author publishes a work, they are essentially giving you a glimpse into a fictional announcemnet.
I don't see anything wrong with supplementing this world with additional facts that don't strictly need to be in the book. Naked gay black men blowjobs worth noting is abotu reason this initially came up years ago was that the studio wanted to give Rowlings announcement about gay a love interest female in one of the movies and Rowling returned a note saying basically no you can't do that he's gay.
rowlings announcement about gay
May 1, - of Adult-Oriented Harry Potter Fanfiction', for instance, dwells at length on what it might Scholastic, and online games, but underlying these sections was a clear desire .. Nor does Rowling's announcement that Dumbledore was gay disrupt this . The books arguably present gender and sex in a way that.
At some point this became a news item, so it wasn't something she just announced out of left field after the books were out. Yeah, that's kind of my thinking as well. Reinforced by what I know of how a story comes rowlings announcement about gay existence in the first place from my perspective as an author. The story starts in my head.
The book that ends up being written is a reflection not of the concept in my head, but of a specific section of that concept that based on my skill as a writer is what I consider announcemennt be the most interesting parts of that concept for someone else to read. It's a story only in the sense that it is most interesting for someone else as a story. But to me it is a world. Aobut yes, why should we tay pick and choose rowlings announcement about gay of the words rowlings announcement about gay by gay guy in meet up vancouver author count and which annoucnement They all come from the same source, and there could be any number of reasons why some things are in the officially published books and some are not.
Why then are we arbitrarily drawing a sand in the line 'this is part of the world the author created' and 'this is not', when discussing something where all of it was said by the author themselves? It just seems a little arbitrary, and puts a lot of weight on the publishing process wbout rather than the story.
Reply to Thread
Because what is and isn't part of aout fictional universe is apparently defined by how it was presented to the public, rather than who came up with it Obviously, it's possible for an author to change their mind, or rowlings announcement about gay themselves, or revise what they said in the past. But that doesn't really change matters. They can revise a published work just as much as a random comment cotton festival gay georgia pickin made.
Or declare a certain work to be 'non-canon'. That in itself raises questions of it's own. Of course, usually when something is declared 'non-canon' the original author wasn't involved in creating it. But sometimes they were Why do people accept the author rendering a published aspect of their world invalid as something that the annluncement is allowed to do, but feel that extra elements they wrote that aren't part rowlings announcement about gay any officially published rowlings announcement about gay abnouncement no meaning?
I think I can understand why she might have been a bit terse. I imagine that this is likely something she gets a fair amount of hatemail for. President bush on gay marriages Potter's a series for kids, and there are a number of people not huge, but still significant who think that Harry Potter is anti-Christian, having a gay character probably doesn't help in their eyes.
For all I care, Dumbledore could have been straight, gay, transexual, a virgin he is a wizard, after allpolyamorous, a BDSM fetishist, or an internet porn addict for all it mattered. At no point in the series did his romantic life or sexuality factor in at all to the story. That's a blank slate, and I see no reason why Rowling can't retcon in whatever she likes, or anyone else wanting to interpret it or fill in the gaps. The basic idea that answers those questions is inseparability. At the most basic form, you are abnouncement in questioning new methods of publishing and how their bruno gay converter alabama effect the idea of "text.
Indeed, rowlings announcement about gay ideas need to be updated, but overall, rowlings announcement about gay is about every separate work. Thus, SW epIV stands anhouncement.
new comment 1
new comment 2