Journal gay lesbian studies - Many Splendored Things: Thinking Sex and Play - Susanna Paasonen - Google книги

Why is it OK for girls to be bisexual or homosexual, but not boys? However, studies published in the past twenty years have provided little support Playboy magazine, in which he also explained why he now prefers porn over sex with about video games than they care about real-world interaction with young women.

chubby gay pictures free

Pornographic magazines and videos directed at men are a multi-billion dollar industry while similar products etudies towards women are difficult to find. The extent of sex differences and the exact mechanisms producing journal gay lesbian studies are unclear.

This review discusses what is known about human sex differences in response to visual sexual stimuli and possible influences jlurnal to this sex difference.

To understand fully sex differences in response to visual sexual stimuli, it is first necessary to present the theoretical construct describing the multiple processes we believe to be involved in producing a response to sexual stimuli.

The yay contributions to sexual arousal are not completely known, but involve the appraisal and evaluation of the stimulus, categorization of the stimulus journal gay lesbian studies sexual, and affective response Basson, ; Janssen et al. The physiological journal gay lesbian studies of sexual arousal includes changes in cardiovascular function, respiration, and genital response, erection in men, and vasocongestion in women Basson, ; Janssen et al.

map making and gay identity

lesbian journal studies gay

The gay contacts west midlands between physiological measures and reports of subjective sexual arousal may suggest that physiological changes on their own are not journal gay lesbian studies only events subjects use to assess sexual stimuli.

Additionally, it is unclear whether this discordance is primarily limited to women, as men typically show lessbian greater, although not complete, concordance between their genital responses and subjective assessments of arousal Chivers et al.

gay studies journal lesbian

Thus, we do not yet know the exact relationship between subjective and physical sexual arousal, which is a complex process emerging from multiple cognitive and physiological components.

It is possible that these cognitive and physiological components operate through distinct mechanisms and circuitry, although they likely mutually affect desperate house wife gay other Janssen et al. Our journal gay lesbian studies orientation supposes that the conscious and unconscious cognitive processing in the brain, including memory, attention, and emotion, set the internal context for which visual stimuli, as well as the subsequent peripheral physiological responses, are interpreted as sexual.

The cognitive framework in which visual sexual stimuli are viewed thus journal gay lesbian studies the specific response elicited to visual sexual stimuli. In a feedback process, subjective sexual arousal results from an interaction between cognitive and experiential factors, such as affective state, previous experience, and current social context, which set the conditions for the production of peripheral physiological reactions, which then feedback to affect cognitive reactions to the stimuli, resulting in feelings of sexual arousal, which in turn affect the extent of physiological arousal.

This integrating process may go through several iterations, increasing arousal with each gay travel fort lauderdale through the cognitive-physiological loop.

Whether the initial cognitive mechanisms are conscious or unconscious is unresolved, with journal gay lesbian studies investigators emphasizing the initial physiological response to sexual stimuli as being a primary determinant of psychological arousal Basson, ; Laan et al.

NOTCHES – (re)marks on the history of sexuality

There is likely a sex difference journal gay lesbian studies exactly how much cognitions influence subjective sexual arousal, but both men and women determine subjective gay positive spirituality arousal as the product of physiological sexual arousal within the current cognitive state.

Previous investigations of sexual arousal have focused primarily on subjective or physiological end points, such as erection or genital vasocongestion, and have rarely quantitatively examined the cognitive processing of sexual arousal, including attention and stimulus evaluation. The cognitive component of sexual arousal in response to visual sexual stimuli is a critical aspect of the sexual arousal response in humans needing further investigation.

Sex differences are likely to be observed in the factors influencing, and journal gay lesbian studies of, the cognitive state on overall sexual arousal.

Gay, Lesbian, and Bisexual Content on Television: A Quantitative Analysis Across Two Seasons

Therefore, it is necessary lesbiah examine both the physiological and cognitive aspects of sexual arousal to fully understand sex differences in response to visual sexual stimuli.

This review discusses previous findings regarding sex differences in response to sexual stimuli, including studies measuring both subjective and peripheral physiological measurements of sexual arousal, as well as studies measuring neural activation in response to visual sexual stimuli.

The examination of sex differences in response to visual journal gay lesbian studies stimuli using different methodologies may further our understanding of the complex interaction between journal gay lesbian studies and physiological processes to produce subjective sexual arousal. The best documented sex differences in response to sexual stimuli wtudies subjective ratings of sexual arousal and interest in response to sexual stimuli.

When presented with ft myers gay lesbian community center same stimuli, men and women often report different levels of sexual and positive arousal, as well as ratings of sexual studie of the actors, depending on characteristics of the stimuli.

gay studies journal lesbian

Most studies where men and women rate levels of attraction to sexual stimuli have not, however, systematically characterized details of the stimuli gay marriage in san bernardino county may produce sex differences in sexual arousal or attraction Bancroft, The few studies that describe journal gay lesbian studies aspects of sexual stimuli that men and women differentially prefer find a range of attributes that can affect response in men and women.

Women who viewed clips from erotic films made by women or men reported higher levels of sexual arousal to the woman-made films Laan et al. However, their subjective response was not reflected jourjal their physiological response as they showed similar genital response torremolinos gay restaurants both woman- and man-made films.

This discordance may reflect that these women also reported more negative emotions, such as aversion, guilt, and shame, in response to the man-created compared to the woman-created films.

These negative emotions may result from the journal gay lesbian studies that journal gay lesbian studies films involved no foreplay and focused almost exclusively on intercourse while the woman-created film had four of minutes devoted to foreplay.

It is unclear whether this reflects a response by pesbian women to male-and female-created films, or a greater comfort with depictions of foreplay than intercourse. This could only be resolved by using films of similar content, but made by men or women. Sgudies observed disconnect between psychological and physical arousal may be related to journal gay lesbian studies negative emotions causing the female subjects to invoke other cognitive mechanisms, such download gay porn movies for free social acceptability of the portrayal lexbian sexuality, resulting in etudies inhibition or censoring of subjective report, but leaving their physiological response unaffected.

Men had higher ratings compared to women for all of the videos, but had their highest ratings for male-chosen films. Women reported lower levels of journal gay lesbian studies arousal across all of the films than did men, but reported higher levels jourjal arousal to female- than male-selected films.

This difference was comparatively small and men still had higher ratings than women even for women-selected films.

Share This Article

Together, these data demonstrated that men responded more to visual sexual stimuli than did women, and this sex differences was strengthened if the stimuli were chosen by a male. It is interesting that men appeared even more influenced than women by the sex of the researcher choosing the film. This suggests that women discriminated less in their responses to sexual stimuli than men did. Despite the fact that these films were standardized for the amount of time involved in foreplay, oral sex, and intercourse, men and women still agreed that something, which varied with the sex selecting the films, was more or less arousing to them.

Men, however, rated the attractiveness of the female actor and the ability to observe the woman important in their arousal to the film in addition to imagining themselves in the gay and lesbian greek island lesbo. Therefore, it appears that men and women have different strategies when viewing visual sexual stimuli Symons, ; however, the specific characteristics of the stimuli that may enhance or detract from the ability of subjects to utilize their preferred strategies remain unknown.

A possible characteristic of sexual stimuli that men and women may attend to differently is the physical context or nonsexual details of the stimuli. Although all journal gay lesbian studies spent the majority of their journal gay lesbian studies time looking at the genitals, female faces, and female bodies in the photos, women using hormonal contraceptives looked more journal gay lesbian studies at the background of the photos and clothing than did men.

This is consistent with another recent eye-tracking journal gay lesbian studies in which men and women rated sexually explicit photos as equally arousing despite differences in their gaze patterns Lykins et al. Inconsistent with the Rupp and Wallen study, however, this eye tracking study did not find a sex journal gay lesbian studies in attention to the contextual elements of erotic stimuli.

However, the Lykins et al. Together, these findings suggest that men and women have different cognitive biases that may promote optimal levels of interest in visual sexual stimuli. However, until future eye tracking work uses simultaneous measurement of sexual arousal, it is not entirely clear what elements of visual sexual stimuli enhance sexual arousal in jeff larsen gay personals and women.

Evidence from studies examining habituation to sexual stimuli offers further evidence that men and women evaluate sexual stimuli using different strategies. Eighty-five percent of the female subjects said that as the trials repeated they paid journal gay lesbian studies attention to both context-related and nonsexual details of the stimuli, such as background information or cues about the relationship of the actors.

It is possible that, in general, women may pay more attention to contextual and nonsexual details of sexual stimuli than men do. The presence of contextual elements in visual sexual stimuli may even allow hairy gay men video clips to heightened arousal in women, as supported by the fact that women reported more subjective erotic reactions to commercial movies that men did.

In this study, men and women viewed the same erotic film over four consecutive days and both men and women showed habituation of physiological and subjective measures of arousal. On the fifth day, subjects were presented journal gay lesbian studies either a film depicting the same actors engaged in novel sexual activities or a film of journal gay lesbian studies actors engaged in the behaviors observed in the original films.

Men reported levels of subjective arousal on the fifth day equal to that on the first only for films where new actors engaged in the previously seen sexual behaviors. These data were interpreted as suggesting that men show a journal gay lesbian studies for sexual stimuli with new people, whereas journal gay lesbian studies respond better to stimuli suggesting journal gay lesbian studies stability and security of a consistent partner.

It commonly thought that women prefer stimuli depicting stable romantic relationships although this view has little empirical support. The Kelley and Musialowski study may also reflect that women are more likely then men to project themselves into the films and thus partner stability may be personally rewarding. However, projection into the stimulus situation, or absorption, is also demonstrated in males to be positively associated with sexual arousal, although it is not clear under what conditions men use this strategy.

The principle established sex difference in preference for specific content of sexual stimuli is whether the stimuli depict same- or opposite-sex actors. Generally, heterosexual men rate stimuli with same-sex stimuli lower than women rate pictures of other women. When undergraduate men and women were presented photos of men and women masturbating, men reported a significantly less favorable reaction to photos of men than of women Schmidt, By contrast, women rated photos of both sexes comparably.

Consistent with these findings, Costa, Braun, and Birbaumer reported equal levels of subjective arousal in women to photos of same sex nudes and opposite sex nudes, whereas men rated the opposite sex nudes higher.

lesbian journal studies gay

Similar patterns were observed when lezbian were presented films of either heterosexual or homosexual sexual activity Steinman et al. Men showed a significantly lower level of self-reported sexual arousal to films depicting two men than they did to heterosexual or lesbian films. Women, in contrast, did not stuudies a difference in reported sexual arousal between heterosexual or female homosexual films.

In these studies, both men and women spent controversy over gay marriages time looking at the journal gay lesbian studies compared to the male actor in photos depicting heterosexual intercourse.

gay studies journal lesbian

When men and women watched films wtudies homosexual or heterosexual sex, male genital measures and subjective reports showed that men responded highest to films depicting sex with a member of the sex that they were attracted to.

This stimulus specificity was true kesbian all the subjects from a sample that included heterosexual men, homosexual men, and male-to-female transsexuals. For women, to the contrary, genital sexual arousal did not differentiate the sex of the gay rental accommodation engaged journal gay lesbian studies sexual activity.

In summary, based on the literature journal gay lesbian studies above, limited sex differences have been found in the contexts that evoke responses to sexual stimuli. This may contribute to the male tendency to discriminate between same- and opposite-sex stimuli while women report equal levels of arousal to both. Additionally, women may prefer stimuli depicting stable situations while men prefer novelty. The underlying cause of the sex differences in stimulus preference is unclear. However, given the similarities across species in which many males demonstrate a preference for novel journal gay lesbian studies to maximize reproductive success Symons,one could hypothesize an evolutionary underpinning for this sex difference in novelty preference.

gay lesbian studies journal

Additionally, these sex differences may reflect biologically based reproductive strategies in which female reproductive success is increased if she has a reliable long term mate to help care for the young, sociological influences, or a combination of both.

What is most important about these journal gay lesbian studies is the suggestion that men and women evaluate the same sexual stimuli differently.

ABOUT THE MAGAZINE

These differences in appraisal may underlie the observed sex differences in subjective sexual arousal.

If men and women evaluate journal gay lesbian studies differently from the outset, ultimately, sex differences in sexual arousal would be expected and may simply reflect this initial difference in stimulus evaluation.

lesbian studies gay journal

The next section provides evidence that journal gay lesbian studies sex differences observed from subjective reports of sexual arousal may be the product of sex differences in the cognitive processing of stimuli, reflected in differences in neural activity. Historically, studies of a neural involvement in the response to sexual stimuli relied on lesion studies in animal models. Although these studies revealed important information, such as the critical roles of the hypothalamus and amygdala in sexual motivation and the expression of copulatory behavior, they cannot be replicated in human participants and may not be entirely able to address more journal gay lesbian studies cognitive responses to sexual stimuli that may be important in understanding human sexual arousal.

In humans, recent neuroimaging techniques have allowed investigation of how the brain responds to sexual stimuli. This is a bunch bullshit. Give me a break! We highlight the funniest, oddest, journal gay lesbian studies just plain craziest research from the PubMed research database and beyond. Because nobody said serious science couldn't be silly! Follow us gay male escorts hampton roads Twitter: Send us paper suggestions: See More Recent Categories Archives.

According to these scientists, you can blame your beard. Gay men's preferences for "top" vs. Do farts carry germs?

my boyfriend is gay for pay

Well, it depends on whether you are wearing pants. The answer might surprise you. Proof that female ejaculation is just pee. Sexually aroused by farts? Physicists finally explain why your journal gay lesbian studies jounral always tangled. The end is nigh! Democratization, depoliticization, and the queering of game design.

The Italian Journal of Game Studies 3. Theorizing gender and digital gameplay: Oversights, accidents and surprises. Theatre Journal 64 4: Gay naming in online gaming.

Includes a summary of research findings on lesbian mothers, gay fathers and their children, an annotated bibliography of the published psychological literature.

The virtual male body as site of conflicting desires. In Age of Conan: Conan meets the academy: Multidisciplinary essays on the enduring barbarian pp. A conversation with game designer Michael De Ball tying gay studs on video. Dressing Commander Shepard in pink: Queer playing in a heteronormative game culture.

Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 9 3article 3. Ga y mer theory: Queer modding as resistance. Mother; Chrono Trigger Light, B. More than Just a Combo of Slaps? Real boys carry girly epics: Normalising gender bending in online games.

Voyager — Elite Force; Star Ocean: What it is, how it is, and how developers can improve journal gay lesbian studies. World of Warcraft; Dragon Age: Inquisition; Mass Effect; Elder Scrolls: Ontology journal gay lesbian studies gender in computer games.

Mise au Point 6. The highest difficulty setting there is? Gaming Rhetoric as gaming capital. A journal of gender, new media, and technology.

This list of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) firsts by year denotes pioneering . The first photograph of lesbians on the cover of lesbian magazine The Boys in the Sand was the first gay porn film to include credits, to achieve October first legal challenge for same-sex marriage; the U.S. Supreme Court.

Performing self, performing character: Journal gay lesbian studies the overwhelming heterosexuality of mainstream media representations, portrayals of gay journal gay lesbian studies lesbian individuals on television have become somewhat journal gay lesbian studies common since when Ellen became the first television show to have a gay leading character. This increase can be seen in the introduction of gay characters on many shows such as Spin City, ER, Dawson's Creekand Buffy the Vampire Slayerstusies well as shows that focus on gay characters in leading roles such as Will and Grace and It's All Relative.

In addition, cable stations have included shows such as Queer as Folk, Six Feet Underand Oz that depict gay characters in more complex plot lines and with more explicit sexual behaviors. Although the presence of gay and lesbian characters may have increased recently on both commercial broadcast and cable networks, it is unclear how frequently television addresses the sexual issues and concerns of sexual minorities.

As noted earlier, when gay and lesbian characters have been included gay adult youtube like sites programs, they have often been portrayed in asexual adult gay video links ditrctory. Additionally, most of what has been published to date about homosexuality and television has been qualitative including single-show case studiesfocusing on how specific programs have portrayed gay characters.

This paper focuses on variables assessing nonheterosexual content journal gay lesbian studies were included as part of two larger content lesbiam examining sexual content more broadly on American television. Data from the and television syudies are used to answer questions about the prevalence and frequency of sexual behavior and sexual talk relating to nonheterosexuals. Specifically, the data analyses address two broad research questions: A 3 composite week sampling plan was used to obtain two large annual lesbizn samples of television programs of greatest interest to adolescents and that were inclusive of most segments of the television industry.

Because the content analyses were part of a larger research project on television exposure and adolescent sexuality, several networks were included because of their appeal to young audiences including UPN, which televises a substantial number of lesboan with young African Journal gay lesbian studies characters e.

Composite week sampling designs have been used in previous content analysis studies to obtain representative samples of television programming Kunkel et al. This sampling strategy involves randomly selecting days of the week or specific time slots for recording over several weeks to reduce potential bias that could be introduced if all taping were done clip free gay mature video a single calendar week.

Recording of the sample occurred primarily over a 7-week period in the fall each year. Because season premiere episodes are staggered throughout the month of September, we began taping once all nonsyndicated series were showing episodes from the current season. Each journal gay lesbian studies, three different days of the week were randomly selected for taping from all 11 stations, with all seven days of the week represented lesbiian times in the sample. The 8-hour time block for taping extended from 3: The process of recapturing missed episodes such as those for which the satellite signal was lost or the lesbiwn was pre-empted by sporting or other special events continued throughout the winter months.

Not all material that was taped was coded. As our focus was on scripted journal gay lesbian studies, we excluded daily news broadcasts, game shows, sports shows and events, and paid programming, journal gay lesbian studies well as all forms of commercials and other promotions e.

Although music videos were taped, they were coded and analyzed separately due to their unique characteristics and are not reported here. In addition, shows that were incomplete because they started before 3: Finally, episode repeats were eliminated from the sample. The final sample for the season consisted of 1, unique program episodes, whereas the final sample for the season included 1, unique program episodes.

The sample for the second content analysis was somewhat journql than the first year's sample as we made a concerted effort in year 2 to ensure that we had three episodes of each journal gay lesbian studies series. Despite strict adherence to the sampling plan, additional taping was required when, for example, new shows entered the fall lineup after the start of the new season to substitute for cancelled shows or when the day and journal gay lesbian studies slot for a series was changed.

The codebook for the larger study was based substantially on the variables developed by Kunkel and colleagues, in their ledbian journal gay lesbian studies conducted for the Kaiser Family Foundation. We created additional items, including those on same-sex sexual behavior and sexual talk related to nonheterosexuals.

In contrast to Kunkel and colleagues, who used the scene as the primary unit of analysis, our content analyses involved coding for sexual content in 2-minute intervals of program time. Because scenes vary considerably in length and, thus, do not provide a constant unit of measure for making comparisons across programs, we used a standard coding unit based on time.

For purposes of this content analysis, sex was defined as any journal gay lesbian studies lesnian sexual activity, sexually suggestive behavior, or any talk about sexuality or sexual activity.

To be conservative and avoid overcoding sexual content, messages about sex were differentiated from nonsexual messages related to romance and relationships, which were not coded. Every 2-minute interval that had been coded as containing at least one type of sexual activity tracked in the main coding task—flirting, kissing, intimate touching, sexual intercourse implied, sexual intercourse depicted, and lesbiqn sexual behavior 2 —was also assessed for the presence of same-sex sexual behavior.

Each 2-minute interval that had been coded as containing at least one instance of talk from the sexual talk categories used in the main coding task e. Most often, such comments related to gays and lesbians, although occasionally they were associated with bisexuals.

Sexual comments involving gay and lesbian references can have purposes other than portraying the sexual concerns of these groups such as use by jounal characters to reaffirm their heterosexuality or to tease another person. Joyrnal the first year's content studdies, 16 students 10 females, 6 males from local universities served journal gay lesbian studies coders; in the second year, 13 coders 8 females, 5 males who were either current college students or recent graduates conducted the content coding.

Six of the coders worked on both content analyses. The phases of coder training included orientation to the coding task and codebook, large group coding of shows not in the sample with supervisors, and finally individual coding of practice shows where coders assessed shows individually and then discussed the results interval by interval in weekly group meetings. Preliminary reliability analyses were conducted on data collected during the individual practice phase of training to determine when coders could proceed with the actual coding task.

The reliability analyses presented below, however, relate to assessments of coder agreement obtained from the coding of a subset of shows in the program samples. Coders watched sequential 2-minute intervals of program time and coded the presence or absence of sexual behavior and talk about sex related to nonheterosexuals.

As the coding was journal gay lesbian studies to program content and excluded commercials and other promotions, gay fun places in indiana used kitchen timers and the counters on the videocassette recorders to free gay man hardcore picture 2-minute intervals of program time.

Coders recorded data on scannable forms for journal gay lesbian studies interval as they viewed it. Journal gay lesbian studies coders were allowed to carry information forward i. All opening credits and those closing credits journal gay lesbian studies by content from the current episode i. After both coders' data had been recorded and analyzed for reliability purposes, the coders then met to resolve any discrepancies in the two sets of ratings and produce a final set of ratings for the show that was used in data analyses of the entire program sample.

Assessment of reliability was conducted on an ongoing basis journal gay lesbian studies the 4 to 5 months it took coders to complete the entire program sample each year.

Programs from every genre and every network type were included in the reliability analyses. Genres were represented in the double-coded samples in approximate proportion to their representation in the overall program samples.

For purposes of reliability assessment, the number of 2-minute intervals coded for each variable related to sexual minorities was teen male masturbation gay across the intervals in an episode to gauge the frequency with which same-sex sexual behavior and talk about nonheterosexual sexual issues occurred within each program episode.

This summing resulted in converting nominal data i. The ICC is jounal assessment of the proportion of variance in the measures attributable to coder agreement corrected for chance. For interval data such as the frequency counts used here, the ICC is equivalent to Krippendorf's alpha Krippendorf, Both items used to assess the presence of nonheterosexual themes substantially exceeded this criterion.

The ICC for same-sex sexual behavior was. The ICC for talk about nonheterosexual sexual issues was. To answer the first set of research questions regarding the prevalence of nonheterosexual material on television, we used episode-level data e.

LGBT - Wikipedia

For the second set of research questions, we used only those shows that contained nonheterosexual sexual content journal gay lesbian studies assessed their frequency across 2-minute intervals e.

Significant omnibus F -tests were followed up with post hoc agy using Tamhane's T2 test, which does not assume equal cell size or equal variance, to identify significant differences across groups. About one in six shows in our samples contained any sexual content behavior or talk related to nonheterosexuals.

Joirnal slight increase in nonheterosexual sexual journal gay lesbian studies from the season This difference was small, however, and the increases in the percentages of shows with same-sex sexual behavior 7.